ITNT℠

In the News Today℠

Wikileaks is a Hostile 21st Century Information Weapon

The plan was all along to let the press bring the questionable "leaks" to their audiences. Obviously this is a highly orchestrated project that is way beyond Assange's capacities (which shows that he is an asset of someone).
Wikileaks is a Hostile 21st Century Information Weapon

Related: The Monostream Media is a Dangerous Joke


“… could become as important a journalistic tool as the Freedom of Information Act.” – Time Magazine about Wikileaks.

Arthur F. Wayne, ITNT NEWS – From the very beginning, Wikileaks seemed a very suspicious operation. Today most people have no idea how Wikileaks got started. If you’re interested in that history watch Richard Hall’s talks about Assange and Wikileaks: Part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4.

In 2006-2007 the following statement was published on Wikileaks its website (emphasis added):

Wikileaks is developing an uncensorable Wikipedia for untraceable mass document leaking and analysis. Our primary interests are oppressive regimes in Asia, the former Soviet bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, but we also expect to be of assistance to those in the west who wish to reveal unethical behavior in their own governments and corporations. We aim for maximum political impact; this means our interface is identical to Wikipedia and usable by non-technical people. We have received over 1.2 million documents so far from dissident communities and anonymous sources.

[…]

Wikileaks opens leaked documents up to a much more exacting scrutiny than any media organization or intelligence agency could provide. Wikileaks will provide a forum for the entire global community to examine any document for credibility, plausibility, veracity and falsifiability. They will be able to interpret documents and explain their relevance to the public. If a document comes from the Chinese government, the entire Chinese dissident community can freely scrutinize and discuss it; if a document arrives from Iran, the entire Farsi community can analyze it and put it in context. […]

Wikileaks their primary interests include exposing governments in Sub-Saharan Africa: Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Dem. Rep. Congo, Rep. Cote d’Ivoire, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, The Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

Literally NONE of these countries are operating an oppressive global empire like the EU is doing and like the U.S. and Israel are doing as well, jointly. The only people who would benefit from exposing mostly developing countries their governments are those who seek to control the Sub-Saharan region’s resources and who seek to uproot the African cultures (perhaps one of the most sophisticated, yet brutal, forms of racist imperialism).

According to Brookings and the World Bank the top 10 resource-rich countries in Sub-Saharan Africa are Nigeria, South Africa, Angola, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Sudan, Tanzania, Zambia, Botswana, and the Republic of Congo.

The Sahara holds the most strategic nuclear ore, and resources such as coltan, gold, and copper, among many others, are abundant on the continent wrote Al Jazeera in 2018.

To have reliable access to these resources (through foreign contractors) it is crucial that the countries in the region are constantly destabilized. That is exactly what has been happening throughout Africa for many decades.

Wikileaks also has as their primary interests exposing Asian and Middle-Eastern countries, as well as former Soviet satellite states. Concerning the Soviet states and Asian countries it’s quite easy to see that one of the purposes of the “leaks” is to create a fresh breeding ground for ‘communism’ (anti-Westernism) in those regions. This is how ‘enemies’ are created for and by, especially, the U.S. A country that needs endless wars, its survival depends on it.

So, when there were few enemies left that the American people really hate enough to justify new wars Wikileaks was created to solve that problem. When there are no more enemies, just create new ones yourself.

And here’s Wikileaks telling us how this works: “Wikileaks opens leaked documents up to a much more exacting scrutiny than any media organization or intelligence agency could provide.”

They actually tell you the mind game that they’ve created. Instead of ‘authoritative’ news sources – the establishment press – and intel agencies taking the heat for creating tensions and wars, Wikileaks is squeezed in between to take care of the dirty work that could otherwise jeopardize the funding of both the establishment press and the intel agencies.

They actually said that, that the media and the spy agencies can’t ‘leak’ too much. How can Wikileaks open “leaked” documents to “more exacting scrutiny than any media organization or intelligence agency could provide“? When it are the press and the intel agencies that have far more resources and manpower than Wikileaks. None of this makes any sense.

This one is very interesting as well: “Wikileaks will provide a forum for the entire global community to examine any document for credibility, plausibility, veracity and falsifiability. They will be able to interpret documents and explain their relevance to the public”

First they write that the “entire global community” will have access, then Wikileaks writes that “they” will “interpret” and “explain” the relevance to the public. Clearly, Wikileaks is not referring to the “entire global community”, but rather to the press. The above quote reads like it was lifted from a hatched scenario included in a secret memo written by a spy agency when they set up Wikileaks.

The plan was all along to let the press bring the questionable “leaks” to their audiences. Obviously this is a highly orchestrated project that is way beyond Assange’s capacities (which shows that he is an asset of someone). He doesn’t control the press like the revisionist zionists do. That much should be easily understood by most folks now.

Share this: